St Petersburg Times
http://www.tampabay.com/news/politics/local/article911491.ece
 
Anti-Gay Rights Activist Seeks To Ban Same-Gender Benefits
By Bill Varian, Janet Zink and Beth Reinhard, Times/Herald Staff Writers
November 21, 2008

TAMPA — Seeking to capitalize on statewide passage of a gay marriage ban, a leading antigay-rights activist is setting his sights on same-sex domestic partnership benefits.

David Caton, executive director of the Florida Family Association, says he will seek a change to the Hillsborough County Charter in 2010 to pre-emptively ban same-sex benefits for county employees.

Efforts to recruit volunteers and collect signatures from voters to get the issue on the ballot will begin early next year, he said.

In interviews with the St. Petersburg Times and Miami Herald on Thursday, Caton sought to frame the issue as a fiscal, as much a moral, argument.

"We're going to use the momentum from the marriage amendment to speak to the fact that most people in this state don't want a recognition of that type of relationship," Caton said. "At this time of economic stress, our government should not be providing benefits to nonemployees on the basis on their sexual relationships."

Gay-rights activists said any such effort by Caton will only galvanize an already motivated bloc of Hillsborough County voters. Those voters have shown greater evidence of organization and hustle in rallying for candidates and causes they support.

"We've got a coalition now, and we've got people who will work very, very hard to ensure he is not successful," said Sally Phillips, president of the Hillsborough County Gay, Lesbian, Bisexual, Transgender and Allied Democratic Caucus. "He'll have a fight on his hands."

In addition to passage of Amendment 2, Caton said he probably would not be pursuing the matter at this time if not for the election of openly gay County Commissioner Kevin Beckner, who won office Nov. 4. He cited strong turnout at Beckner's swearing-in Tuesday as evidence that his supporters will press him to pursue a gay-rights agenda.

"I think the heavy turnout for his swearing-in was more than just friendship; it was a politically motivated event," Caton said.

Beckner did not return a phone call seeking comment.

Hillsborough County does not offer domestic partnership benefits to employees, although the city of Tampa does. A change to the County Charter would not affect city employees.

The city's benefits, however, also figure in Caton's strategy.

Caton said he would seek to use the political momentum of a Hillsborough charter change to influence Tampa elections for City Council and mayor in 2011. With gay marriage bans getting passed in several states, he called same-sex domestic partner benefits the next frontier in the gay-rights battle.

"Domestic partnership will be the battlefield between the pro-family agenda and the gay-radical agenda,'' Caton said. "They're saying it,'' and he and other like-minded people are prepared to respond, he said.

Tampa Mayor Pam Iorio said Caton's efforts will not pressure the city to change its policies. A majority of City Council members have said they would not seek to end same-sex benefits.

"We are going to continue our domestic partner benefits," Iorio said. "It's the right thing to do."

Hillsborough County Commissioner Mark Sharpe said Caton is seeking to address a problem that doesn't exist. In the meantime, the county is facing major challenges, he said.

"My focus is going to be 100 percent on solving some weighty issues: job creation, transportation," Sharpe said. "I'm going to spend the next two years trying to figure out how to bring people together to address quality-of-life issues."

COMMENTS:
by Susan Nov 21, 2008 7:54 PM
"He cited strong turnout at Beckner's swearing-in Tuesday as evidence that his supporters will press him to pursue a gay-rights agenda." My husband & I attended Kevin's swearing in because he's our friend. Imagine that, gay people have friends!
by Rich D Nov 21, 2008 7:39 PM
I am so seriously curious what portion of the king james VERSION of the bible tells this man and others, to be a good christian you should seek out those that you can judge as immoral and make them sick by not allowing them care. Chapter and Verse?
by Heather Nov 21, 2008 7:31 PM
Since the employers should not be providing benefits based on sexual relationships (to non-employees), then I guess he should end all benefits to anyone not employed at a company as I beleive hetrosexuals may have sexual relationships as well!
by Robert Nov 21, 2008 6:03 PM
Caton ought to get a real job and worry about his own morals and how best to save his own soul. He seems like such a radical and mean-spirited, but I repeat myself.
by Hank Nov 21, 2008 6:01 PM
What a repressed closet bigot. Yes the constitutional amendment is good. Let it go at that. If a couple of queens want to share a life together who cares? It doesn't hurt me or Caton.
by John Nov 21, 2008 5:57 PM
Proponents of Amendment 2 promised the issue was only marriage, not domestic partner benefits. They promised not to attack these benenfits. Here we go, just like in Michigan, they lied and are now attacking domestic partner benefits.
by Kat Nov 21, 2008 5:55 PM
It's amazing to me how hateful some people can be. Yanking benefits from people based soley on their personal life is a hate crime!! Thank God Mayor Iorio and Commissioner Sharpe understand Floridians have ACTUAL issues to address.
by kathleen Nov 21, 2008 5:53 PM
there are children hungry and abused, elderly lonely and suffering, families of all shapes and sizes struggling, and these "pro-family" breeders and spreaders of hate spend their time and money on gay equality issues? shame on them.
by Caton-a-phobic Nov 21, 2008 5:51 PM
Hey Caton -I suppose Blair will have some time on his hands to help lose this battle as well(since you've been such a staunch supporter of his). Sounds like another goofy Blair idea to me. This is not an issue for the County Charter. GIVE IT UP!
by Dena Nov 21, 2008 5:49 PM
Thank you for saying no to the hate, Pam Iorio! I am proud to call you my mayor.
by Joy Nov 21, 2008 5:49 PM
This is why Caton didn't agree to leave domestic partnerships alone when confronted at Tiger Bay. It wasn't just about gay marriage it was always about discrimination and this proves it. Time to say no to hateful actions.
by banshiii Nov 21, 2008 5:47 PM
We told you so.
by Amanda Nov 21, 2008 5:43 PM
I honestly cannot see any of Canton's bitter rage getting acknowlegement with so many councils members, the mayor and sincere activists telling him that they don't care what he's for or against and that they hold no respect for his intentions.
by Rich Nov 21, 2008 5:23 PM
If Mr Canton gets his way, I certainly hope that any heterosexuals that have divorced are charged and forced to repay any benefits their spouse may have recieved. If we have to protect marriage, then lets protect it gosh golly. How about jail time?
by Holly Nov 21, 2008 4:40 PM
This is exactly what the proponents of Amendment 2 stated specifically would NOT happen. The voters have been deceived, which is not surprising when people try to put church values in state affairs. Don't say No On 2 did not warn you of this!
by kathleen Nov 21, 2008 4:39 PM
anyone remember the nazi's?
by Zeke Nov 21, 2008 4:39 PM
Voters were assured Amendment 2 would not strip benefits away from anyone. Caton doesn't seem to understand, when promises are made, they must be kept. Caton's actions will cost heterosexual benefits too. Obviously he cares less who he hurts.
by Mark Nov 21, 2008 4:38 PM
Mr Caton will find out the hard way that his actions, his deceit, and his agenda will be stopped dead in its tracks.
by Case Nov 21, 2008 4:37 PM
Hard to imagine this group doesn't have something more positive to focus on than something that hasn't even happened. I'm beginning to think anyone this obsessed with the issue at hand should seek professional assistance-learn to deal with their fear
by Sharon Nov 21, 2008 4:37 PM
David Caton is an abhorrent human being. Through the guise of religion he aims to deceive people to take away the rights of a minority by being an oppressive majority. It is a sad comment on our democracy that we let despots take away human rights.
by Kay Nov 21, 2008 4:36 PM
WOW, how is this not outright bigotry? People may not want gay marriage NOW (this is a "when", not "if it ever occurs" issue), but if two gay adults pledge long-term fidelity to each other just like heteros do, why NOT the same treatment? PREJUDICE.
by Not Gay Nov 21, 2008 4:30 PM
Caton need to cut bigger holes in his pointed white hat and sheet he wears to the meetings and realize he doesn't speak for all of us. It must be tough for him to be so Godly.
 
Depending on Pop-Up Blocker: Use Browser Back Button or Close Window to Return to Pride Tampa Bay's Website